June 23, 2011
Dear Rockwood Parents and Patrons,
I know many of you read the article in Sunday's Post-Dispatch and/or Bill McClellan's article in Wednesday’s paper. Let me begin by offering my sincere apology for any perception of impropriety caused by using the consulting services of two former colleagues from Minnesota and the hiring of these individuals for two administrative positions. I know you may have questions or concerns about this decision. I'd like to explain:
Open Positions
At the beginning of the 2010-2011 school year, the district was without an associate superintendent and had interim placements in two executive director positions. The Board of Education made the decision not to fill these positions at the end of last school year because they and Dr. Larson agreed the new superintendent should be involved in the hiring of staff for these critical positions.
As a result, I began my first year in Rockwood without a complete team of full time administrators. We have an exceptional leadership team in Rockwood, who willingly performed extra job duties this past year because these other positions were not filled. Dr. Karen Seiber and Dr. Jill Ramsey agreed to serve in interim positions, with the restrictions placed on them as retirees from the state public school retirement system.
Outside Consultants
Given all of the other work already in place, along with the additional work load for current staff, the Board believed it was important to provide some extra support for me as I fulfilled their expectations in conducting my Listening and Learning Tour and developing an Action Plan for continuous improvement.
The Board decided to allocate funds to me to use in implementing my vision for increasing student achievement in Rockwood. These funds were approved in an open meeting held on Sept. 2, 2010. I chose to use some of these funds for consultants who could assist me in creating the framework for a continuous improvement plan. The two consultants were people with whom I had worked previously. They had a proven track record in providing the expertise and assistance I needed.
The Board was aware of this decision and unanimously approved the contracts for these individuals. The amount of money allocated to these consultants was consistent with monies allocated to other outside consultants.
New Administrative Hires
As far as the open positions are concerned, it was never the Board’s intent to leave these positions unfilled. We were fortunate to use two of our retired administrators on a limited basis this past year; but, we always knew that was for the short term. Mr. Smasal and Ms. DuBois followed an established interview process for administrators that included interviews with parents, staff and administrators. There was no deviation from this established process for these two applicants.
The salaries for these positions were previously established as part of the district's administrator pay plan. Again, the salaries are consistent with past salaries for these positions.
I realize the impact of these decisions and regret the way they have been perceived. My focus for all decisions is on the students of this district and how we can help them be successful. I remain committed to our mission and to working with teachers, parents and our community in support of that mission.
Sincerely,
Bruce Borchers, Ph.D.
Superintendent
Editor's Note: This posting is an exact duplication of the letter issued by Bruce Borchers today, and does not reflect any input or edits from the Patch staff.
I don't like the position of PR Czar Rockwood has either. No matter what happens in the district of tens of thousands of students, the Rockwood Communications Person is on the scene that she knows nothing about reading word for word from the approved responses handbook she has. For example, the tragic situation where a student dies and the press looks for a comment. Is the principal or teacher allowed to speak? No way! We can't have someone who actually knew the person speak words from the heart about how sad they are. Rockwood has to parachute in the Communications person out of central office to control the message that Rockwood puts out. What she says is in response to anything is 100% calculated and political and adds nothing to the story.
THREE interviews for each of the positions. 93 applicants. Anyone want to bet we're talking about the same three people, two of them from Minnesota? What do you think, taxpayers? These hiring decisions were made on our behalf since at the end of the day BB works for US. Does this seem like a legitimate way to find good help?
I'm sorry but I have to correct you. The letter was from the Communications officer, it was ONLY posted by the super. I will now return you to your normal programing.
No matter how the district or the superintendent try to spin this, it was done quietly with the intent of not having many people know what was truly going on. If the superintendent, 2 new hires, and the board that made these decisions really care about Rockood and/or kids in general they will quit and allow the district to move forward. Until they are gone, Rockwood will have to endure more scrutiny and suffering.
Contract is from April - December 2011 - total amount is $22,750.