.
Feedback

EPA Revisits Times Beach Former Dioxin Site 15 Years Later

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency teams will start taking new soil samples Tuesday afternoon at Route 66 State Park near Eureka, the former dioxin site cleaned up in 1997-1999. They have new technology to apply.

One of the worst dioxin contamination sites in the United States will be revisited, about 15 years after it was made into a Missouri state park. Come Tuesday afternoon, visitors near will see U.S. Environmental Protection Agency teams again digging in soil at the park.

Tuesday will represent the first time new EPA technology will be applied anywhere in the United States.

Being called "the ideal field laboratory" by EPA experts, EPA’s pilot study at Route 66 State Park located off Interstate 44 is expected to produce new data and information to contribute to EPA’s broader knowledge of dioxin, and guide federal and state agencies toward the most effective means of addressing dioxin at other locations.

Times Beach was a small town of 2,240 residents in St. Louis County. The town was completely evacuated early in 1983 due to a dioxin scare that made national headlines. It was the largest civilian exposure to dioxin in the United States. Times Beach was founded in 1925 on the flood plain of the Meramec River.

Most dioxins are not intentionally produced, but instead are the byproducts of chemical processing or burning, according to EPA authorities. The type of dioxin that exists in very small traces today at Route 66 State Park was introduced to the area’s soil in the early 1970s when waste oil containing high levels of dioxin was sprayed on the streets of Times Beach as a means of dust control.

This sampling activity is part of an EPA Region 7 pilot study to apply newly developed science and the latest technology to test for very small, or trace, amounts of dioxin in soil at the park. EPA is conducting this study at the request of the Missouri Department of Natural Resources (MDNR), which owns Route 66 State Park, to ensure that the park remains a safe environment for visitors and park employees alike.

Chris Whitley, EPA public affairs specialist for Region 7, said EPA teams will collect samples for the next three to four weeks. He also said it likely will take 90 days to interpret all the results.

"Park visitors should have no apprehension going to the park during this time," said Whitley. "They will not see anyone in moon suits, and they should not be alarmed. We're simply applying new science and technology there."

During the 1990s cleanup of Times Beach, soils containing elevated levels of dioxin were excavated and replaced with clean backfill. Soil testing following the cleanup confirmed that residual dioxin concentrations in the soil were below a level of concern for any future use, according to EPA materials.

See EPA fact sheet that accompanies this article.

This new round of testing—which will use more sensitive equipment and more advanced testing methods than were previously available—said Whitley, is expected to confirm the park’s soils meet EPA’s recently updated dioxin toxicity criterion and are still protective of human health and the environment.

Whitley told Patch outcomes of the pilot study should be available by early October.

Bill Elmore June 7, 2012 at 11:49 am
The EPA administrative trick of "delisting" the soil cooked at Times Beach allowed for its reburial on site. If they really dig down, they will find dioxins, probably PCBs and other petro chemicals. I am glad I don't live downstream. Bill Elmore
Jenn Webb February 22, 2013 at 12:28 pm
I lived right across hwy 44 from 1987 to 2000. After a plethora of health concerns, and severe depression, anxiety & fatigue now consuming half of my life, I have a grave concern that my proximity to Times Beach, and the "clean-up" of dioxin may not have played a role. J.W.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Eureka-Wildwood Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Frank Johnson (Editor) June 19, 2013 at 09:49 am
Thanks for sharing your opinion, Dale! I've incorporated your comments into the story.
Frank Johnson (Editor) June 17, 2013 at 03:18 pm
Hi Viola, I posted this on our Facebook page and received an additional question from our readers.Read More On what street/in what area of Glencoe did Leo go missing?
JOYCE COULTER June 18, 2013 at 02:30 pm
Hi! I sure hope he gets found quickly... we have a tortoise exactly like this.. but much smaller,Read More who is approximately a year old... they can be very fast... so sorry he got away from you! Ours is named, "Turpeester"... I'm sure whatever he is doing he is having a fun time, out running around... I will pray for Leo making it back to you!!! Good luck!
6/16/13
Ryan Thomas June 18, 2013 at 05:32 pm
The owner plans to harvest corn on the property.
Southern Gent June 18, 2013 at 05:48 pm
Thanks, Frank. Makes sense.
Wildwood Tax Payer/Voter June 19, 2013 at 08:55 am
The owner, of course, should do whatever he/she wishes to do on his own property. I'm simply curiousRead More about Wildwood's Planning and Public Work's "guess." How does farming a piece of property instead of allowing it to sit vacant actually decrease its tax assessments? It doesn't change the zoning. What is the zoning of the property? If residential, how much corn do I need to plant on my extra property to decrease my property assessment?
Kurt Greenbaum (Editor) June 6, 2013 at 03:19 pm
Matthew, how interesting. What got you interested in participating in this? Do you have pictures ofRead More your preparations for it?
Charles C Smack May 31, 2013 at 11:38 am
Just What we need. Another liberal info board that limits their scope to narrow, progressiveRead More solutions and topics.
Missouri Lt. Governor Peter Kinder and Representative Tim Jones.
Charles C Smack May 31, 2013 at 11:41 am
I'll never vote for Mr.Jones again. He was a great representative but he has not been aggressiveRead More enough on issues that hurt Missourians he represents, in my opinion.