patching...
Breaking: Pay Increase Approved for Rockwood Teachers »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

To Feed Deer or Not: That is Question on Which Wildwood City Council Will Vote Monday

"Struggles over deer management are not unique to Wildwood or St. Louis or even Missouri. This is a common problem in suburban areas throughout North America," said a state biologist. But how do feeding and fines fit in?

 

Wildwood city councilmembers are scheduled to vote Monday evening about a new ordinance that prohibit feeding wildlife, specifically called in the law as Canadian geese, ducks, waterfowl and any species of deer.

At the Oct. 8 city council meeting, quite a spectrum of varying views were presented about the matter. Patch readers responded with quite a few more reactions, which can be reviewed online.

See previous Eureka-Wildwood Patch article: Don't Feed Bambi in Wildwood

At that same meeting, councilmembers asked Ryan Thomas, Wildwood director of public works/city engineer, to research how many violations and fines had happened in nearby municipalities that already have a non-feeding law in place. Thomas' research indicated the following:

  • Ballwin has had their ordinance in place since August of 2005. They took a “soft” approach in the beginning with warnings, but did not believe a summons has ever been written. Compliance has been very good and most of the violations as to feeding the geese are generated from non-residents visiting their parks. The ordinance is posted in the parks, but as usual most don’t notice the postings.
  • Chesterfield has had their ordinance in place since 2005, and their court clerk advises there has been no enforcement actions associated with violations.
  • Clarkson Valley has had their ordinance in place since 2006; there have been no enforcement actions taken. They indicated they used the threat of enforcement once to gain compliance.
  • Ellisville does not have this specific ordinance. They do have an ordinance associated with the proper storage of horse and chicken feed, with no known enforcement action associated with a violation.
  • Town & Country has had their ordinance in place since February of 2009. There have been no enforcement actions taken.

"Struggles over deer management are not unique to Wildwood or St. Louis or even Missouri. This is a common problem in suburban areas throughout much of North America. Other St. Louis municipalities that have dealt with the issue by allowing hunting on private property include Clarkson Valley, Chesterfield, Creve Coeur, Manchester and Maryland Heights. Kirkwood and Sunset Hills allow for hunting on the public property of Powder Valley Nature Center. Each of these cities had to change an ordinance to allow for hunting with restrictions they felt were needed for their community," said Erin Shank, Missouri Department of Conservation urban wildlife biologist.

Wildwood has always done a good job of allowing for deer management on private property throughout the city, Shank told Patch.

She said Ellisville more recently took steps to allow for a managed archery hunt on Klamberg Woods Conservation Area, which is public property. The first hunt will be November 2012.

"Town & Country took a different approach on deer management. The city defined their objective of lowering the deer population from approximately 65 deer per square mile down to 30 deer per square mile. To accomplish this, they hired a wildlife contractor experienced in sharpshooting of deer to cull the herd. They also funded a sterilization project where does were surgically sterilized and re-released at the same site," said Shank. 

"While Town & Country has certainly spent more money on managing deer, they have also made the greatest strides toward community-wide deer reduction. Surveys conducted in January 2012 indicate that the deer densities are now around 32 deer per square mile."

Related Topics: Deer Regulations, Missouri Deer Overpopulation, Missouri Wildlife Regulations, No Feeding Deer Ordinance, St. Louis County Deer Issue, Urban Deer Management, and Wildwood deer

Marc Perez

6:25 am on Monday, October 22, 2012

I would go to the City Council meeting to speak on the subject but time proven they have their minds made up before the public input session. They will pass another local law no matter what the people say. Restrict, prohibit, ban, that's what the Wildwood City Council does. They feel a need to "Protect people from themselves". We are the Government, we will take care of you. Garbage!

Reply

FedUpVet

8:58 am on Monday, October 22, 2012

More big government. Those that oppose hunting better get ready for sharp shooters hired by the city in their back yards. It happened in Town and Country and is soon coming to a subdivision near you.

Reply

TonY Kalna

12:35 pm on Monday, October 22, 2012

As editor/publisher of Missouri Deer Hunter Magazine, I know a little bit about deer. I'm not a biologist but I've done plenty of research and spent a lot of time talking with wildlife biologists. My point being that while I'm all for people managing their personal property's natural resources (wildlife, fish, timber, etc) how they see fit, and while I'm definitely against big government and more regulations, I think landowners need to consider one point from a biological viewpoint. The Missouri Dept. of Conservation (MDC) recently banned all supplemental feeding of grain etc, and banned mineral and salt licks from the six-county Chronic Wasting Disease (CWD) Containment Zone in Adair, Chariton, Linn, Macon, Randolph, and Sullivan counties. The MDC has concerns that by the deer congregating at localized feeding/mineral stations that they could spread disease, in this case CWD, more readily. While there is currently no CWD in the St. Louis region, it's something to think about.

Reply

Julie Brown Patton

12:49 pm on Monday, October 22, 2012

Thanks very much, Tony Kalna, for that additional information. I had heard Chronic Wasting Disease was a problem in Missouri's past, and may crop up as an issue again.

Reply

Leave a comment